|
|
|
Budget Would Prohibit Deduction for Conservation Easements on Golf CourseFebruary 29, 2012 |
|
Support
If you encounter problems when using this website, or when the website does not function as you would expect, please contact our support team: support@charitableplanning.com. |
Legal
Questions related to our terms of use, privacy policy, copyright or other such legal matters should be directed to our legal team: legal@charitableplanning.com. |
Feedback
If you have comments about the website or our commentary, or if you have suggestions on how we can better serve you, please use our Feedback Form. |
© 2006-2013, CPC Holdings, LLC
Summary
According to page 140 of the Treasury's Green Book explanation of President Obama's 2013 budget, the Administration would disallow an income tax charitable deduction for the contribution of a conservation easement on land "that is, or is intended to be, used as a golf course."
Extended Summary
According to the Administration:
No separate estimate was made of the revenue effect of this proposed change.
CPC Commentary
To the best of our knowledge, the only court decision allowing a (rather substantial) deduction for the contribution of a conservation easement on a golf course was the 2009 Tax Court decision in Kiva Dunes Conservation, LLC v. Commissioner (see our earlier commentary). The only issue before the court in the case was the valuation of the easement. The IRS conceded the deductibility of the contribution on brief, regardless of the method of valuation.
Thus, it is not a situation where "court decisions have upheld" the deductibility of a contribution of an easement for what amounts to a private benefit. Instead, IRS failed to make the argument at all. Kiva Dunes does raise the question whether the courts have correctly construed the statutory requirement that the easement be contributed "exclusively for conservation purposes."
The decision usually cited in this connection is Glass v. Commissioner, a 2005 Tax Court decision, affirmed by the 6th Circuit federal appeals court in 2006, allowing a conservation easement deduction for 2.64 acres of beachfront property along the shore of Lake Michigan. In Glass, the IRS argued unsuccessfully at trial and on appeal that the use of the property undermined the stated conservation purposes, particularly since the subject property was small and no similar limitations were imposed on immediately adjacent properties.
Any statutory remedy should address the problem at this more basic level, rather than specifying the largely symbolic example of a private golf course.
Relevant Documents