|
|
|
Other Items of InterestSeptember 30, 2011 |
|
Support
If you encounter problems when using this website, or when the website does not function as you would expect, please contact our support team: support@charitableplanning.com. |
Legal
Questions related to our terms of use, privacy policy, copyright or other such legal matters should be directed to our legal team: legal@charitableplanning.com. |
Feedback
If you have comments about the website or our commentary, or if you have suggestions on how we can better serve you, please use our Feedback Form. |
© 2006-2013, CPC Holdings, LLC
Summary
In recent days:
Extended Summary
1. Form 706 instructions Finalized
As noted in our commentary of September 12, a close reading of Form 706 and its instructions makes it clear that an executor of the estate of a decedent who is survived by a spouse may want to file an estate tax return even if the value of the gross estate is well below the $5 million filing threshold. This is necessary to preserve the unused portion of the "applicable credit amount," i.e., the exemption equivalent, for portability to the surviving spouse's estate. This analysis is to be confirmed later today with the issuance of Notice 2011-82.
The legislation creating portability requires that the amount of the unused "applicable credit amount" be established on a timely filed estate tax return in the first decedent's estate. Although IRS might arguably have created a shortened form for this purpose, it has not done so.
Thus, an executor who intends to preserve the portability of the first decedent spouse's unused credit equivalent will be required to prepare and file a complete estate tax return. With the first deadlines fast approaching, it may be advisable to take an automatic six-month extension by filing Form 4768.
2. Memo on Tax Strategy Patents
The Memo noted that with the enactment of the Patent Reform Act, Pub. L. 112-29 ("Act") which was signed into law on September 16:
The purpose of the Act, the Memo said, is "to keep the ability to interpret the tax law and to implement such interpretation in the public domain, available to all taxpayers and their advisors." The Memo noted that there are two exceptions:
The Memo directed the attention of examiners specifically to tax strategies for employee benefit plans, tax-exempt organizations, or other entities that must be "structured or operated in a particular manner to obtain certain tax consequences." The Memo also noted that the relevant section of the Act applies:
3. Nonprofit Hospital Property Tax Exemption
The governor's action responded to a request from the Illinois Hospital Association in the wake of rulings from the state revenue department, denying exemptions to three major nonprofit hospitals on the ground that they did not provide sufficient charity care. Those denials followed a ruling last year by the state supreme court, denying a property tax exemption to a Catholic hospital on similar grounds (see our earlier commentary).
In a letter announcing the action, Gov. Quinn said that he asked his staff, in collaboration with the revenue director, to work with key stakeholders such as the hospital association, legislators, and the state attorney general. He requested that these parties develop recommendations for legislation that would address the uncertainty surrounding the property tax exemption of nonprofit hospitals. The letter set a deadline of March 1, 2012, for a set of recommendations that would consider, among other things:
The Tribune reported that 15 evaluations are in the pipeline, along with the three denials. The Governor's action apparently will suspend those proceedings while appeals go forward in the three pending cases. However, as noted in the Governor's letter, if the March 1 deadline is met, "no decisions will be issued on the recent exemption denials while parties are working together in good faith."
4. Electioneering By 501(c)(4)s
The 23-page letter detailed allegations that each of the four organizations had spent and/or planned to spend substantial sums of money in presidential and congressional election campaigns, promoting or attacking specific candidates.
Crossroads GPS was founded with the help of Republican party strategists Karl Rove and Ed Gillespie, and is affiliated with American Crossroads, a Section 527 political organization. A Section 527 organization may spend directly on advocacy, but must disclose the names of its contributors. A Section 501(c)(4) organization need not disclose its funding sources, but it may not spend directly on a candidate's campaign.
Priorities USA and its related political action committee were created expressly to "mimic" the structure of Crossroads GPS and American Crossroads, but to support Democratic rather than Republican candidates.
American Action Network shares office space with Crossroads GPS and American Crossroads and is said to coordinate its activities with theirs.
Americans Elect was initially formed as a Section 527 organization, but then changed its status to Section 501(c)(4). According to the letter, Americans Elect is "seeking to gain a place on the 2012 ballot in all 50 states for a presidential candidate it intends to nominate."
The Campaign Legal Center is an exempted entity under Section 501(c)(3), while Democracy 21 is a Section 501(c)(4) entity, with an associated education fund exempted under Section 501(c)(3).
Relevant Documents